Cycles of Living Things

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is a peculiar topic to write about in this way.

As I posted years ago, it is not the questions that create the answers, it is the answers that create questions to be asked. What this means is that answers are already formulated before questions even come into being, existence. Humanity, in all it's wisdom, often perceives that questions come before answered, where the perception of questions are in existence before answers can be formulated.

When this occurs within a cycle, consciousness and reality becomes distorted, in other words consciousness becomes lost within it's own creation. When this occurs due to a cycle that creates distortion, like with the end of the sun cycle when the sun also becomes distorted, destructive, desired or lusted for answers are sought.

A good example of this is our dams in Australia, where they were
never suppose to be full again, and that the great barrier reef is doomed due to global warming, climate change or whatever is desired, when quite the opposite has occurred. The distortion of consciousness therefore reality does not stop there. The very same authorities that put out this kind of disinformation are believed in relation to Ukraine and who really did start the Ukraine war. I don't think I need to mention the distortion created using the covid pandemic and covid vaccines.

When you base a reality on what answers are most desired, the questions become distorted, in the process it is the desired answers that create the questions. However, when you take out the answers that are most desired, the answers still formulate the questions to be asked, where the answers come before the questions. Yes, even when the desired answers come before the questions, humanity still thinks the questions are created prior to the answers, in the process creating a distortion of consciousness therefore reality.

Why have many people in human history predicted what will occur in the future, at times in the far future accurately? When you extract your consciousness from what is desired and lusted for, the answers are no longer distorted and no longer come after questions, in the process creating clearer more accurate predictions. Accurate foretelling, or even asking questions and getting immediate correct answers, takes one to know that answers formulate the questions. The answers already exist before formulation of questions.

Imagine a reality based on where desired and lusted for answers are determined by questions asked!!

In my young teenage years, I was in a state where I could ask questions and receive immediate correct answers. The only reason for this was due to not thinking that the questions formulate the answers, and avoiding creating questions for desired answers. Today, I don't ask too many questions plus I am not in the same state than I was in my teenage years, on purpose.

Recently, an answer formulated in my consciousness that created the question to the answer already answered, that all of what is presently occurring is of the cycle of life, and whatever we do will make no difference to the way the cycle plays out. If the cycle is of chaos and abuse, that is the way the cycle will play out, however, one can choose to be of a different cycle of life.

To enter into another more passive cycle, one has to first get right away from the mentality of throwing rocks and sticks at each other, today's missiles and bombs. I think only desiring to be aware of what one desires does not help either, for this is like throwing rocks and sticks at something you are trying to usher away. To enter into other cycles, one has to desist in the rock and stick mentality and accept each and every cycle for what it is, not an easy task to carry out.

When the sun reaches the end of it's cycle, a great amount of distortion will occur. Seen as humanity is greatly influenced by the suns cycle, it is most likely that humanity will go through the same process at the end of it's cycle.

Imagine for a moment being influenced by a cycle of life that is not of distortion!!

Yes, we live within a universe that can express a great deal of distortion. This distortion can and often does influence consciousness, accept this as being a natural part of the universe and move on from this. No, one's own consciousness does not have to be primarily influenced by cycles of distortion, for we are far more than what the physical universe depicts we are.

Western atheism, for example, is not about anything beyond the physical domain, so is primarily influenced and dominated by what? Physical distortions. Look at how, under the influence of western atheism, very different from eastern atheism, that man has caused global warming/climate change, while knowing that a few centuries ago a great frost hit Europe due to an inactive sun. Today, the sun being a lot more active is not causing global warming, climate change!! Notice the distortion. Is there a connection between the suns distortions and the distortion of humanities consciousness?

So why are so many of us not influenced by physical distortions, that are quite natural by the way?

Many of us are more influenced by non-physical cycles that can be, but not necessarily, less of distortion. Non-physical entities can be just as much if not more of distortion, however, you will find this distortion is based on physicality. Instilling fear, as we are seeing today, is of distorting consciousness therefore reality. Fear is actually a physical attribute.

Let's be honest, there is presently a lot of distortion going on at present and not just to do with fear, transgenderism is a prime example, where sexually abusing children is accepted. Transgenderism is not same sex couples but there can be a link at times, like a link between non-homosexual people and paedophilia.

The cycle of living things is what it is, desiring to make something else out of it is of this distortion. The cycle of life can't be manipulated, but one can choose to be more influenced by other cycles not of distorting consciousness therefore reality.

It is interesting observing how humanity is moving more away from the non-physical to the physical, and how consciousness therefore reality is becoming more and more distorted. This is indeed a part of the physical cycle of life, a cycle we don't necessarily have to be primarily influenced by but choose to be.

So why do many of us choose to go down this path?

Control, like with NATO wanting more control of natural resources, evidently. We desire to control the natural cycles we are influenced by, be it atheist or spiritual. Desiring control and fearing being controlled by a natural entity is of distortion. I personally chose to be influenced more by the physical natural cycle of life at an early age, for I did not fear this cycle of life's control over me, be it of distortion at times. Once the cycles of living things become imbalanced, distortion is sure to follow. Expect in the cycle of living things for there not to be balance at times, it is what it is, and don't fear not having control over the cycle of living things.

Living with the Ego

Life is a union of pain and pleasure

Wisdom is the embracement of this union as a whole. 

~Mathew G~

Written by Mathew Naismith

Through learning from pain instead of suffering from pain have I learnt this lesson well, how could I write such a thing otherwise!!

To a lot of people this won't make sense, and understandably so, for the avoidance of pain to gain as much pleasure as possible in life will lead to this degree of incomprehensibility.

Life is about starting and ending points, birth and death is a prime example. As we know life to be relies on starting and ending points, in relation to love, a starting point of love to an ending point of love. From the starting point of love there is pleasure, at intervals displeasure or pain, this is life as we know it. At the ending point (death) love is of great sorrow or pain. Would you rather not have that love to lose in the first place? With love comes a degree of pain in one way or another.

Be it to humble oneself to life and the union of pain and pleasure.

As a consciousness in the absence of ego would no doubt do, to avoid this would be of an ego in control!!

At no time can a consciousness of the absence of ego avoid not humbling itself to life as we know it, to life's pain and pleasures. Existence as a whole can only exist through union, the union of life and death, pain and pleasure, a state of ego and a state in the absence of ego. To avoid life's pain is obviously of the controlling ego for only does the ego in control desire to control anything. Could you imagine a consciousness in the absence ego desiring or even needing to control anything?

Union simply denotes oneness, a union of life and death, pain and pleasure, a state of ego and a state in the absence of ego. There is no consciousness of the absence of ego without a consciousness of the presence of ego. Look at this way, the perception of heaven gives us an idea of union, as the perception of hell gives us an idea of disunion. One is not without the other while at the same time not being of the other. Hate can exist within love as love can exist within hate, but heaven and hell can't exist within the other.

So if heaven and hell can't exist within the other, it is understandable that a state of the absence of ego and a state of ego don't exist within the other either. This of course doesn't mean the other doesn't exist just because they are not of the other. Because the ego desires to take control, it would certainly seem that any sense of control relates to disunion (hell).

Okay, would honesty be of heaven and hell be of dishonesty (deception)? A dishonest deceptive consciousness will always try to get the ego to take control of what the ego feels. Would this not to only feel pleasure in life? This is while life is a union of pleasure and pain.

I am kidding you not; life is a union of pain and pleasure, not a disunion of pain and pleasure. Any kind of disunion distorts life, possibly leading to the extinction of life.

I have stated before, "Embrace misery", for to only embrace pleasures in the absence of pain will only lead to the extinction of life. There is nothing wrong with life just because it doesn't give us enough pleasure, but for an ego who wants to control its pleasures, life is simply a misery and understandably so. You must embrace both pain and pleasure for one without the other is the extinction of both pain and pleasure, life itself.

You would think a consciousness in the absence of ego would be of the absence of both pain and pleasure therefore life as the ego knows life to be!! 

If your ego desires to be in this state in any sense, you are not consciously of this state but of an ego consciousness. This state of the absence of ego is not a state you desire or even need to be only of. Often a consciousness humbling itself to life's pain and pleasures is of this state while also humbling itself to life as a whole. It is this union, not disunion, of life's pain and pleasures that leads to an awareness of this state. This state is simply of the whole, while at the same time humbling itself to life's pain and pleasures. Life's pain and pleasures, ego, is of this state while, like heaven and hell, are not within each other, this of course doesn't mean one is separate from the other.

A state of ego in not separate to a state of the absence of ego, while at the same time not being of what the other is. But as the ego desires, one is separate therefore a disunion (hell) is created instead of a union (heaven). What have we created with desiring pleasure over pain, the disunion of pain and pleasure? The same is with a state of the absence of ego and a state of ego!!

Ego-Natural Flow of Life

Written by Mathew Naismith

Going with the natural flow of life, the natural flow of water, in the absence of control of life, of the water, that we are all presently experiencing and a part of, no matter how much we desire to separate ourselves from this natural flow.

The natural flows actually refers to all motion, the ego, in the absence of a controlling ego. Of course the ego in control often desires to be separate itself from natural flow, to an ego not having the desire of desiring to control the flow of life/water.

There are people, like my wife and I, who simply go with the flow within the present, whatever that flow may be in the absence of a controlling ego. The ego in control doesn't gently flow, it often turns the water, life, into a torrent, recreating a desired flow often in opposition to the natural flow. As of torrents, often a different direction is enforced by the force emitted by desires, desires to enforce a different direction of flow of life/water. This is instead of calming the present waters of life that are often deemed negative, most likely because they don't fulfil our desires or what we demand life to be.

The natural flow of life, the ego, isn't there for our pleasures, it is simply there to experience. Yes, within this natural flow, life won't always be rosy (positive), but the ego in control demands that life must serve it's desires, which means that life has to be always pleasurable to the ego.

People like me simply don't expect or demand of life, of the present flow of water, that we must feel pleasurable all the time. We certainly don't try to separate one part of consciousness from the rest of consciousness so we can fulfil the controlling egos desires.

As of life, human consciousness, presently controlled by the ego in control, we must also go with this flow, while not becoming of what this flow represents, the desire to fulfil our desires at any cost. Would a responsible parent allow their badly behaved child go on being badly behaved to fulfil one's own pleasures? So why ignore the negatives in the present flow of water to fulfil our own desires of demanding to feel good all the time? As the badly behaved child will only become worse in their behaviour when their behaviour is ignored, so will the collective consciousness.  

Yes, the natural flow of water isn't always a comfortable temperature, but we really shouldn't demand more of life than what is to fulfil what our ego in control desires. Anything beyond of what the natural flow of what is, is something else than natural.....            

The Book of Life

Written by Mathew Naismith

I am presently trying to assist the painter in painting our house

I am at present reminded of the time at school when the pencil/pen would simply drop from my hand. I remember while doing exams that I was incapable of picking up the pencil/pen; I of course was simply physically incapable of finishing exams way back then.

The moral to the story is, accomplishing anything physical for me is a huge accomplishment, especially these days. You simply cannot tell a book by it's cover when the cover is only a preview of what really is within the book itself.

The cover shows I don't take painkillers, this means in accordance to our own book I am not in trauma, certainly not as in as much trauma as people who do take painkillers. I also try to do things without complaint. The cover simply does not tell the whole story or even one part of the story, the cover is what it is, a cover for the story, nothing more.

Does a crippled up body from an accident or a stroke tell the true story of a person?

You simply cannot tell a book by it's cover but many people do, in actuality, a lot of people mistakenly read the cover and perceive that they have now read the book.

Life as whole is like this. The cover shows all we are is of physicality when the book itself tells us so much more, but only if we are willing to desist in perceiving what the cover tells us what the story as a whole is all about..........

I have had a chronic injury since I was six (6) years old. Because of my awareness and connectedness to the book itself instead of the physical cover of the book, I was able to do things in life that I was suppose to be physically incapable of doing. There is simply so much more to the book than it's cover. The cover is limiting, the book itself isn't.

On face value there is a message in what is written here, however, deeper down there is another message, one is of the cover, the other of the book itself. We can either perceive awareness by it's cover or be of awareness by reading the book itself, preferably before we perceive what the book is all about in accordance with it's cover.

Yes, the cover tells one story, the book another, which one do we really want to live life by!!